by David Lane
M.Sc.(Hons), Dip. Tchg.
Based on an address given at:
Onslow Chapel Khandallah Wellington,
on Saturday, 30 October 1993.
Francis Bacon (1561‑1626), widely recognised as the
Father of modem science wrote:
"There are two books laid out before us to study to
prevent us failing into error: the volume of
Scriptures which reveal the will of God and the volume
of the creatures."
The Bible is man's primary source of God's revelation
and the "volume of the creatures," God's general
revelation through nature, proclaims God's "invisible
attributes, His eternal power and godhead" (Rom. 1:20;
cf. Ps. 19:1‑4). This paper provides an example of how
God reveals Himself through both books of revelation,
and how they complement one another.
Return to Top
The Volume of the
Creatures
Present among the humus layers on the forest floors of
New Zealand's indigenous forests, is a tiny "worm‑like"
creature belonging to the genus Peripatus. It is called
a "living fossil," for the phylum (or larger
classification unit) to which it belongs, has remained
virtually unchanged since the Cambrian period, some 600
million years ago (based on the evolutionary time
scale). In other words, species very similar to those
existing today, can be found as fossils in the oldest
rock layers which contain the first fossils of
multicellular organisms. Peripatus like creatures from
the Cambrian appear fully functional and fully
differentiated in terms of their complex anatomical
features, and no intermediate forms leading up to them
have been found in earlier rock strata.
Organisms like Peripatus share a number of features with
both worms (Phylum Annelida) and arthropods (Phylum
Arthropoda. includes insects), and so have been
described as the "missing link" between these two phyla,
However, they possess a number of unique
features and so are classified in a separate phylum ‑Onychophora.
They are not really "missing links," since there is no
evidence that the origin of true worms or arthropods is
linked to this phylum. Onychophora have been so highly
specialised from the time they first appear in the
fossil record, that they could not have been a
generalised "intermediate form" which gave rise to new
phyla.1
Diagrams below of Onychophora show that it is a
highly complex organism. The design features present
could not have evolved by a trial‑and‑error mechanism of
natural selection operating on chance mutations. Such a
'mechanism' is central to the Neo‑Darwinian explanation
for the origin of biological diversity in the world
today. Figures 1 and 2 below show the reproductive
system of a common earthworm.

Reproductive System of an Earthworm (Onychophora)
[Cross-Section]

Reproductive System of an Earthworm (Onychophora)
[Side View]
Figures 3 and 4 show the internal structure of an
onychophoran revealing the presence of an ovary
containing eggs, and a uterus. Only in the Australian
onychophoran genera are females armed with an
ovipositor, enabling them to lay their large yolky eggs
enclosed in a chitinous shell, in moist situations
outside the body. Many other species are viviparous,
meaning that the establishment of a placenta permits a
longer period of development in the uterus of the
mother, so that the young are born in a very
advanced stage. Uterine secretions provide for the
nutrition of the embryo, and the nutritive material is
obtained by the embryo through a special embryonic
membrane or through a "placental" connection to the
uterine wall. In this respect they are highly advanced.2
The most highly evolved Mammals are considered to be the
Placentals (eg. bats, whales, dolphins, porpoises,
seals, mam etc.). And yet the lowly Onychophora appear
to have possessed a placenta hundreds of millions of
years before the mammals arose (according to the
evolutionary time‑scale).

Internal Organs of an Earthworm (Onychophora)

External Organs of an Earthworm (Onychophora)
Worms and lowly "Worm‑like" creatures like Onychophora
are masterpieces of engineering design. The female
reproductive systems of Onychophora alone incorporate
all three methods of egg development found in the higher
animals. The circulatory system is similar to that of
arthropods (including the insects) and blood is
propelled forward by a tubular dorsal heart. Like worms,
Onychophorans move by extension and contraction of the
body, except that the body is raised off the ground by
logs. Waves of contraction, affecting both sides of the
body simultaneously and only a few segments at a time,
progress from the anterior to the posterior. When the
segment is extended the legs are lifted from the ground
and moved forward. The ingenuity of design evident in
the organ systems of this creature, points to a
Designer. The genetic programming which codes for all
these design features, and ensures their transfer from
one generation to the next is truly a marvel.
In Romans, the apostle Paul wrote:
"that
which is known about God is evident within them [the
unrighteous], for God made it evident to them. For since
the creation of the world His [God's] invisible
attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have
been clearly seen, being understood through what has
been made, so that they [the unrighteous] are without
excuse" [for rejecting God]. When examined, the
biological world is found to reveal overwhelming
evidence of God's eternal power as Creator. The plan and
purpose in biology is self‑evident. It proclaims the
glory of God. However, those intent on suppressing the
knowledge of God (see Rom. 1:18), insist that nature
itself should be credited as the source of biological
design. Naturalistic science excludes by definition even
the possibility of a supernatural First Cause of the
rationality, causality, and unity of the universe.
Return to Top
The Definition of Science
The word 'science' (from the Latin scientia, from scio,
to know), was originally defined and intended to mean
"truth" or "facts" or "knowledge". It meant in a general
sense, knowledge, or certain knowledge; the
comprehension or understanding of truth or facts by the
mind. Thus the 'science' of God was sew to be perfect.
The essence of the scientific method has until now been
claimed to be observation, experimentation,
falsifiability, and repeatability. However, scientific
thought soon parted from theology because it excluded
the idea of an agent of 'Force' outside of or beyond
natural measurable forces. Modern science is presented
as neutral to the idea of the supernatural. This is fine
when it comes to the empirical sciences which
methodologically exclude the supernatural. If they did
not, the very idea of testability and repeatability
could not work. However, the notion of a First Cause is
also excluded from those areas of modern science which
fall outside the definition of the empirical sciences.
For example, the science of origins which involves
speculations and hypotheses about the origin of the
first life forms and the universe, is not open to
testing, and yet it excludes the very idea of a Creator
a priori. Such an assumption is purely arbitrary.
Modern science is dominated by naturalistic philosophy.
There is an implicit faith commitment to the dogma that
the universe contains within itself the factors
responsible for its own self‑evolution and progress
towards higher and higher levels of consciousness.
Scientists committed to this faith system forget that
the very birth of modern science owes its very existence
to Christianity.3
Return to Top
The Biblical Basis for the Presuppositions of Modem
Science
The biblical world view provided all the main
presuppositions or premises upon which modem science is
founded. Without the Bible as a source of revelation
about the nature of reality, modem scientists have
little, if any basis for believing any one of these
premises which include:
-
The universe exists
-
The universe is ordered
-
The universe is understandable
-
Our senses are reliable
-
The "law" of cause‑and‑effect operates
-
Natural law and processes are
uniform through all space
-
Natural law and processes are uniform through all time
-
All natural law is ultimately unifiable
Let us briefly examine each of these premises:
(1)
The universe exists
The most rational basis for belief that the universe
exists derives from the revelation that it is contingent
to a Creator. All manifest reality exists in God
(Acts 17:28) Who upholds it (Col. 1:17), sustains it
(Acts 14:17), communicates His personal reality through
it (Rom. 1:19‑20), animates it (Ps. 139:13‑16), is
glorified by it (Ps. 19:1‑4), derives pleasure from it
(1 Chron. 29:17; Ps. 35:27; 147:11; 149:4), and brought
it into existence by His Sovereign will (Heb. 11:3; Rom.
4:17; Rev. 4:11). No thing has any substantive reality
whatsoever, independent of God. No thing contains the
principle of its own being independent of God (1 Cor.
8:6; Eph. 1:23). If it did, then God would not be God!
For those who deny the existence of God, the existence
of the universe cannot be established on rational
grounds, and therefore experimental science has no basis
or rationale. Since the non‑existence of God cannot be
proved (it is impossible to prove a universal negative),
it makes more sense to assume the eternal existence of
God beyond and prior to the coming to be of manifest
reality. We know from science that the cosmos had a
beginning in the past. We can therefore infer that since
every event has a cause (see point 5), the universe
exists because it has its origin in an Agent or First
Cause that pre‑existed the cosmos.
(2)
The universe is ordered
The presence of order in the universe is a surprise if
we adopt the belief that it originated by chance and the
operation of strictly trial‑and‑error processes. Order
suggests an information source (defined as a 'surprise
effect'). The complex coded information found in the
storage retrieval systems of biology find their
analogues in the modem world of information system
networkings. From an argument based on analogy, such
order must derive from an intelligent mind. The order we
refer to here. is that which incorporates coded
information as found in the DNA strand etc. We can
assume order in the universe since God is revealed in
Scripture as a God of order. He is not fickle or
capricious as portrayed in many other world religions.
(3)
The universe is understandable
That the universe is understandable is indeed
surprising. Albert Einstein stated: "The most
incomprehensible fact of nature is the fact that nature
is comprehensible." That it is comprehensible suggests a
purpose. Scripture teaches that the universe is Man's
home and that through studying it, Man learns about the
character of its Creator. Those who dogmatically adhere
to the view that there is no purpose or meaning in the
universe have an impossible task to explain its inherent
intelligibility.
(4)
Our senses are reliable
Like evolutionary biologist, Dr Richard Dawkins, author
of The Blind Watchmaker4
evolutionists
are forced to the view that all "design features" in
nature are mere illusions. The engineering marvels
associated with the 'machine‑like' parts of organisms,
are seen to be explained by the human mind imposing
order upon such structures (i.e. the product of
anthropomorphic thinking). Such an argument is absurd,
for it ignores the fact that the order is implicit in
such structures, independent of the mind's
perception. The fact that such structures have operated
successfully before man even understood them, shows that
they have a reality which is not merely in the
imagination or perception of the investigator.
(5)
The "law" of cause‑and‑effect
operates
The premise that the "law" of cause‑and‑effect operates,
only makes sense if it is based in a higher law, or
derives from a higher law. This higher law is the one
which God operates in His dealings with men in the
spiritual dimension. For example, the existence of death
and suffering in the world (an effect) has a cause ‑ the
Fall of man (Gen. 3; Rom. 5: 12). As Paul wrote: "the
wages of sin is death" (Rom. 6:23). God also blesses
those who are faithful to Him and obey His word. Paul
summed up the spiritual law of cause‑and‑effect:
Do not be deceived, God is not
mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also
reap. For the one who sows to his own flesh shall from
the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the
Spirit shall from the Spirit reap eternal life
(Gal. 6:7‑8).
(6) & (7)
Natural law and processes are
uniform through all space
and time
Premises
(6)
and (7)
reflect the fact that God's natural law cannot be broken
by His creatures. And yet He is not bound by such
physical laws, for He can intervene in history and these
laws are subject to Him alone.
(8)
All natural law is ultimately
unifiable
The quest for one ultimate unifiable law finds its basis
in the truth that there is only One God upholding and
sustaining all natural law. Paul identifies Christ as
the One through whom all things hold together:
For in Him all things were
created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and
invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or
authorities all things have been created through Him
and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him
all things hold together (Col. 1: 16‑17).
We have seen that at least eight of the premises upon
which modem science is based find their basis in
Scripture. Not surprisingly, all the founders of the
main branches of modem science were Bible‑believing
Christians who were committed through personal faith to
Jesus Christ. They believed that the natural world was
understandable and would give them insights into the
Mind behind the cosmos. As noted earlier, Scripture
declares that the creation reveals the invisible
attributes of God, including His eternal power and
divine nature (or Godhead, Rom. 1:20).
Return to Top
The Volume of Scriptures
If God exists only in His ineffable unity, He could
never be truly known. He must paradoxically be both
source and manifestation i.e. both Father and Son. God
is Father in generation, Son in declaration, Spirit in
appropriation. The Son is eternally begotten of the
Father, and proceeds from the Father to reveal the
Father. The Spirit is eternally the bestower of the life
of the Father and the Son. God is fundamentally the
eternal, omnipresent, transcendent One, the great First
Cause, the source of all being. Being present
everywhere, however, He could never be seen or heard
or sensed anywhere. The purpose behind His
creation must be communicable and the message must be
seen and heard by man. Not only must the invisible and
inaudible God be seen and heard objectively, however, He
must also be experienced and understood subjectively.
God is revealed through Scripture as a trinity ‑ three
eternal distinct persons, who are indissolubly one.
Through the Incarnation the One who holds together the
very 'fibres' of all created reality, appeared in
profound abasement:
Christ Jesus, who although He
existed in the form of God, did not regard equality
with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself,
taking the form of a bond‑servant, and being made in
the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as
a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the
point of death, even death on a cross (Phil.
2:6‑8).
In Psalm 22, written a thousand years before the time of
Christ, we find a series of messianic prophecies which
present in graphic detail the agony of Christ's
sufferings on the Cross. The Spirit of God speaking
through David describes the torment of soul of a man
abandoned by God. The Psalm begins:
My God, my God, why hast Thou forsaken me? Far from my
deliverance are the words of my groaning (lit.
roaring). O my God, I cry by day, but Thou dost not
answer, and by night, but I have no rest. Yet Thou art
holy.
Here we see foreshadowed Christ's cry of dereliction
from the Cross recorded by Matthew and Mark. Matthew
records that after darkness had fallen upon the land for
three hours, at "about the ninth hour Jesus cried out
with a loud voice, saying:
'Eli, Eli, Lama Sabachthani?'
(i.e. 'My God, My God, Why hast thou forsaken Me?')"
(Matt. 27:46; cf. Mk. 15:34).
It was the dread of this abandonment by the Father and
the price He would pay in bearing the world's sin, that
Christ agonized over in the Garden of Gethsemane.
Matthew records that he said to His disciples: "My soul
is deeply grieved to the point of death." He then "fell
on His face and prayed saying, 'My Father, if it is
possible, let this cup [of suffering] pass from Me, yet
not as 1 will, but as Thou wilt'" (Matt. 26:39; cf. Lk.
22: 42; Jn. 6:38). So fervently did He pray, that Luke
records: "His sweat became like drops of blood, falling
down upon the ground" (Lk. 22:44). Them was no other way
for God to atone for sins, except through the death and
shed blood of His Son. This was the way God chose from
all eternity to demonstrate the extent of His love for
man. It necessitated a broach, a rift, and an
estrangement between the eternal Son of God, and His
Father. As Emile Rideau SJ expresses it:
Christ's baptism in death [was]
the death of death, the abolition of man's
estrangement, the demolition of the wall that, in
separating man from God, deprived him also of true
communion with his fellows.... the Redemption [can be
viewed as an] aspect of God's judgement of history, of
condemnation of evil, and at the same time of the
re‑creation of man, and the universe. The mystery of
the Cross... represents ... [an] abyss, the excessive
and inordinate, the unjustifiable extremism of love.
It resists every attempt to rationalize it as a means
to attain an end, or a stage in history. [The Cross]
introduces a new criterion and a new law; it creates a
wisdom that is the converse of reason mutilated by
sin. Finally it is the condition for man's transition
to a higher sphere and his entry into the ineffable
mystery of God.5
God the Father was able to save the Son from death, but
through the obedience of the Son, He became the source
of eternal salvation. Concerning Christ, the writer of
the Hebrews states:
In the days of His flesh, when
He offered up both prayers and supplications with loud
crying and tears to Him who was able to save Him from
death, and who was heard because of His piety,
although He was a Son, He learned obedience from the
things which He suffered, and having been made
perfect, He became to all those who obey Him the
source of eternal salvation (Heb. 5:7‑9).
Psalm 22 portrays the extreme anguish of soul of God's
suffering servant, who is abandoned by God:
But I am a worm, and not a
man, a reproach of men, and
despised by the people. All who see me sneer at me....
I am poured out like water and all my bones am out of
joint. My head is like wax, it is melted within me. My
strength is dried up like a potsherd, and my tongue
cleaves to my jaws, and thou dost lay me in the dust
of death. For dogs have surrounded me, a band of
evildoers has encompassed me. They pierced my hands
and my feet. 1 can count all my bones. They look, they
stare at me. They divide my garments among them, and
for my clothing they cast lots (vs. 6‑7,
14‑18).
This man is the Messiah, God's Righteous One, of whom
Isaiah states: "His appearance was marred [literal
rendering, "Corruption," personified] more than any man,
and His form more than the sons of men" (Is. 52:14). So
distorted was His appearance that the Lord Jesus cries
in His heart: "But I am a worm, and not a man." This
figure of speech emphasises the extent of his
humiliation. He was scourged, forced to wear a purple
robe and crown of thorns, spat upon, ridiculed, forced
to carry his own cross to the site of execution, and
crucified alongside common criminals. He was stripped of
his garments and His clothing was gambled for.
In what sense could He have been said actually to be a
"worm"? Why did the writer choose this particular word?
The Old Testament mentions a number of different types
of worms that wore known to the ancient Israelites. The
worm referred to in Psalm 22:6 was a particular worm
known as the "scarlet worm." It was from this worm that
a valuable secretion was obtained with which to make
scarlet dyes. The same Hebrew word is sometimes
translated as "scarlet" or "crimson" (cf. Is. 1:18).
When the female of this worm was ready to give birth to
her young, she would attach her body to the trunk of a
tree, attaching herself so firmly and permanently, that
she could never leave again. The eggs deposited beneath
her body were thus protected until the larvae were
hatched and able to leave and enter their own life
cycle. As the mother died, the crimson fluid stained her
body and the surrounding wood. It was from the dead
bodies of such female scarlet worms that the commercial
scarlet dyes of antiquity were extracted.
This is an amazing picture of Christ, dying on the tree,
shedding His precious blood that we might live through
Him. God declared through Isaiah:
"Come now and lot us reason
together", says the Lord. "Though your sins are as
scarlet they will be as white as snow. Though they are
red like crimson, they will be like wool"
(Is. 1:18).
It is only through the vicarious sacrificial death of
Christ on behalf of sinners that sin could be atoned
for. Without the shedding of blood there can be no
remission of sins or forgiveness (Heb. 9:22). As Paul
wrote:
He [God] made Him [Jesus Christ]
who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, that we might
become the righteousness of God in Him (2 Cor.
5:21).
In Isaiah chapter 53 we find a detailed prophesy
concerning the Messiah. God speaking through His prophet
records that His wrath would fall on His Servant (His
Son), who would bear the punishment for sin on behalf of
sinners, and so justify many sinners:
He was despised and forsaken of men, a man of sorrows
and acquainted with grief, and like one from whom men
hid their face. He was despised and we did not esteem
Him. Surely our griefs He Himself bore and our sorrows
He carried. Yet we ourselves esteemed Him stricken,
smitten of God and afflicted. But He was pierced
through for our transgressions, He was crushed for our
iniquities. The chastening for our well‑being fell
upon Him and by His scourging we am healed. All of us
like sheep have gone astray. Each of us has turned to
his own way. But the Lord has caused the iniquity of
us all to fall on Him. He was oppressed and He was
afflicted, yet He did not open His mouth. Like a lamb
that is led to slaughter and like a sheep that is
silent before its shearers so He did not open His
mouth. By oppression and judgement He was taken away
and as for His generation, who considered that He was
cut off out of the land of the living. For the
transgression of my people to whom the stroke was due?
His grave was assigned to be with wicked men, yet with
a rich man in His death, although He had done no
violence, nor was there any deceit in His mouth.
But the Lord was pleased to crush Him, putting Him to
grief If He would render Himself as a guilt offering,
He will see His offspring, He will prolong His days,
and the good pleasure of the Lord will prosper in His
hand. As a result of the anguish of His soul He will
see it and he satisfied. By His knowledge the
Righteous One My Servant will justify the many as He
will bear their iniquities.... He poured out Himself
to death and was numbered with the transgressors. Yet
He Himself bore the sin of many and interceded for the
transgressors.
All the details of this prophecy were fulfilled
approximately 700 yew after they were written. It
pleased God the Father, that His Son the Lord Jesus
Christ, should be crushed and put to death. It was only
through such an act of expiation that God's wrath could
be propitiated or appeased (Rom. 3:25; 1 Jn. 2:2). God's
Holy nature and His justice demands that sin be
punished. As Paul says: "the wages
of sin is death" (Rom. 6:23). Peter wrote:
"You were not redeemed with
perishable things like silver or gold ... but with
precious blood, as of a lamb unblemished and spotless,
the blood of Christ"
(1 Pet. 1: 18‑19). Linking this act of atonement to
Isaiah's prophecy Peter adds:
Christ also suffered for you,
leaving you an example for you to follow in His steps,
who committed no sin, nor was any deceit found in His
mouth, and while being reviled, He did not revile in
return, while suffering, He uttered no threats, but
kept entrusting Himself to Him who judges righteously.
And He Himself bore our sins in His body on the cross,
that we might die to sin and live to righteousness,
for by His wounds you were healed. For you were
continually straying like sheep, but now you have
returned to the Shepherd and Guardian of your
souls (1 Pet. 2:21‑25).
Why is it that so many fail to respond to this
demonstration of God's love? Why do so many fail to
recognise the Creator's handiwork in the creation? Paul
provides the answer when he states:
"the god of this world has blinded
the minds of the unbelieving, that they might not see
the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is
the image of God" (2 Cor. 4:4). Paul explains the
reason why some have responded to the same gospel:
For God, who said, "Light shall
shine out of darkness," is the One who has shone in
our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the
glory of God in the face of Christ (2 Cor.
4:6).
Unregenerate man needs first to hear the gospel, since
"faith comes from hearing and
hearing by the Word of Christ" (Rom. 10:17). Man
who is made in the image of God (Gen. 1:27) is utterly
dependent upon the gracious invitation of God, who does
not wish for any to perish but for all to come to
repentance (2 Pet. 3:9). This dependence upon the work
of God's Spirit is due to his fallen nature (Gen. 3). A
man who is blind and spiritually dead can never be
regenerated (or made alive) and brought to saving faith
without the work of God's Spirit (Eph. 2:1‑4). He needs
to be "born again" in before he can become alive in the
Spirit (Jn. 3).
Conclusions
If God the Creator was prepared to stoop in profound
abasement and become "a worm", that we might be remade
like unto the perfect image of God possessed by His Son;
how can we fail to respond to his love? When we reject
this love, we reject the messages from two books:
Scripture and the book of the creatures. An "apologetic"
or "systematic objective evidential defence of the
Christian faith" [Gk. apologia] can be made by the
Christian, drawing on both books of revelation. This is
not a suggestion to intellectuals, but a command to all
believers (1 Pet. 3:15). The evidence presented must be
real and it must be clear to all who "sanctify the Lord
God in their hearts" and who approach such study and
witness "with meekness and with fear." True science
complements the Scripture, in assisting us to understand
more about the invisible attributes of God ‑ His eternal
power and nature (or godhead) (Rom. 1: 19‑20).
Return to Top
©2002 Wellington Christian Apologetics Society
(Inc.) All Rights Reserved.
Previously published in
Apologia (The Journal of the Wellington Christian Apologetics Society)
Vol.2, No.3, p.4-12, 1993
References
-
Robert D. Barnes, Invertebrate Zoology (1st publ. 1963;
Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co., Second edition 1968), pp. 565‑69.
Return to text
-
Ibid.,
p.
568.
Return to text
-
M.B. Foster, The Christian Doctrine of Creation and the
Rise of Modem Natural Science, Mind 43(1934), pp. 446‑468;
R.Hooykaas, Religion and the Rise of Modern Science (Tyndale Press,
London, 1960; Stanley Jaki, The Road of Science and the Ways to God (The
Gifford Lectures) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978).
Return to text
-
Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker (1st publ. by
Longman, 1986; London: Penguin Books, 1988), p. 2 1:
"Natural selection is the blind watchmaker, blind because it does not see
ahead, does not plan consequences, has no purpose in view. Yet the living
results of natural selection overwhelmingly impress us with the appearance of
design as if by a master watchmaker.... The purpose of this book is to
resolve this paradox to the satisfaction of the reader, and the purpose
of this chapter is further to impress the reader with the power of the
illusion of design".
Return to text
-
Emile Rideau, Teilhard de Chardin: A Guide to his Thought
transl. Rene Hague (London: Collins, 1967), p. 171.
Return to text
©2001 Wellington Christian Apologetics Society
(Inc.) All Rights Reserved.
Previously published in
Apologia (The Journal of the Wellington Christian Apologetics Society)
Vol.2, No. 3, p.4-12, 1993
|